In his teaching Boyd leaves room for some measure of political activism, (voting, etc.,) but only as over-and-against one's Kingdom calling, not as integral to it. I had believed even voting to be dangerous duplicity, and still do, but I am rethinking it through. Maybe it is healthy and desirable after all, as Boyd suggests, to "vote your conscience" on how the country runs, while still maintaining your distinct identity as a Kingdom-of-God-person. Quoted (unfavorably) in a recent AU blog, Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl says "Politics and faith may mingle, because believers are also citizens. Church and state are home for the very same people." I'm not there yet, but I am conceding the idea, in a basic sense, as a possibility. But we must get our thinking turned around first, or we'll never be on the right foot.
Being immersed in this controversy once again has only served to reinforce my feeling that these questions are at the crux of what it means to be Christian. I'm not denying anybody's salvation, I'm only saying that if you don't see these truths, (not necessarily as I see them, but for themselves,) I'm praying my heart out to God that you will. And for those of us who do see them, I'm praying that these truths would muscle their way beyond our minds and memos and into our lives, as we shoulder our crosses and follow Christ in radical, ridiculous, love-your-enemies faith.
"The distinct kingdom question is not, How do you vote? The distinct kingdom question is, How do you bleed?"
- Gregory Boyd, The Myth Of A Christian Nation (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2005), p. 146
1 comment:
Thanks Aaron. I'll probably get both. As you know, this subject interests me quite a bit. And, though we probably are coming at it from different ends,I'm also rexamining past and present beliefs about the subject.
We are presently 95 miles from St. Luis. Back to logic...
Post a Comment