It looks like the emerging conversation now comes in
three flavors: relevant, reconstructionist, or revisionist. Or half-and-half, or all three, if you're really feeling adventurous. I find myself aligning broadly with the reconstructionist category and only partially with the other two, as I believe relevance to be incidental rather than deliberate and revisionism to often be revising all the wrong things. (Note that reconstructionism here means something entirely different than it does when used in reference to nationalism.) Here's
another discussion of the three categories.
1 comment:
Hmm. Good link, I'll have to read this later. I expect you will continue to share your thoughts on this?
I hate calling people things, but I should know what it is anyways so I can make intelligent conversation...
Post a Comment